The 1956 Best Picture award went to Around the World in 80 Days (1956).It would have been forgotten outside of hardcore cinephile circles had it not been for the fact it had won the award instead of Citizen Kane, the perennial choice for the "greatest film of all time." The 1941 Best Picture award went to a film known as How Green Was My Valley.The Academy Award for Best Picture has had a few missteps over the years:.
Melo on usher confessions album tv#
The former, however, was the highest-grossing film of 1994 and sold over 32 million VHS tapes in North America alone (and 23 million internationally) in addition to billions of dollars of merchandise in 1994 alone, a Broadway musical that has been active since 1997, two TV series, and a remake that grossed over a billion dollars. While the latter film is still popular today, it is one of the more divisive films in the Disney catalog, being criticized for historical inaccuracies at best and being considered the ending of their stellar period in the 90s at worst, along with receiving a "rotten" score on Rotten Tomatoes.
Melo on usher confessions album movie#
One of the losers? Oh, only a cute little Jim Henson movie called Time Piece. While it's a cute movie and there is a decent punchline in there, it's not exactly memorable, and Le Poulet faded into obscurity. At the 1965 Academy Awards, the winner for Best Live-Action Short Subject was Claude Berri's Le Poulet, a 15-minute Deliberately Monochrome short about a family who buys a chicken.The runner-up who lost points for being "too conventional", is likely to do better when they get into the real world because they have a product the industry can actually sell to people who don't spend every waking moment thinking about that artistic pursuit. They want to sell products, not win prizes. However, that person is unlikely to have much success in the industry because most industries are conservative by nature. That tends to mean that they are jaded, and interested in innovation above all else. Often, the audience wants to see a quirky or avant-garde contestant win because they are passionate about the artistic pursuit in question. They are also intended primarily as entertainment, meaning that the judges very likely take into account how a contestant appeals to the show's target audience. They usually take place in highly isolated and contrived environments, which do not necessarily reflect the working environment of the industry the show is based on. Another reason is that the runner-ups simply decided that they weren't up to par in that field (they did lose, after all), but also discovered they had talent in a different field during their time on the show (acting is the most common such talents) and successfully pursued a career in that without attaining the trappings of the original competition's winner.Īlso note that not all contests which are interesting for the public to watch are necessarily very good at discovering talent.
Also note that, almost by definition, many more people don't win than do (for every winner, there are multiple runners-up from the top Ten or Twelve contestants.) So even if any given winner is more likely to hit it big than any given runner-up, you still might see more runners-up who become stars than winners.